jump to navigation

The Coast Was Always Clear November 4, 2009

Posted by monty in books.
Tags:
add a comment

eraser

Part 4 of my original draft, coming right up.  As for my progress in National Novel Writing Month, I’m nearly 8,000 words in (on my way to a 50,000-word target).  Just a reminder that I’ll start posting sections of the new writing – which is a continuation of the draft you’re reading now – once I’ve posted all of the original, just so everyone who wants to get up to speed with the plot can do so.  The section I’m posting tonight is just about the halfway point, which means I’ll probably start posting new writing by the end of the weekend.  We all caught up?  Okay, then.

*****

As it turned out, it was actually more difficult for Garrett to convince his parents to let him borrow the car than it was to talk Steph into going out with him.  His parents were big on “good choices,” and every action Garrett made outside the home had to be filtered through the lens of its relative prudence, discretion, and potential impact on his future.  They were not over-protective parents, exactly; Garrett wasn’t confined to quarters, and it was seldom that a request to do something with his friends was denied.  But not only was he the first child, he was the only child, and his parents were perhaps a little over-occupied with the notion that Garrett understood the consequences of his actions.

It would be reasonable to think of it as a guilt trip.  As far as Garrett could tell (and he knew this was just amateur psychology on his part gussied up as a rationale for him to feel irritated at their protectiveness instead of grateful that they cared, which was totally unacceptable at his age), they didn’t want to be those parents – the ones who said no, who imposed unfair curfews, who got into screaming matches over car keys, loud music, and traces of what might be, but never was, cigarette smoke.  They wanted to trust their first, their only, so in an effort to be the kind of parents perhaps they themselves had wanted, they removed anger from the home, banished irrational judgments, and replaced them with a brand of sarcasm and guilt shaded just enough to pass as good-natured kidding.  Garrett knew it was definitely preferable to what some of his friends endured.  Bill Fahrbach had once come home five minutes after his 11 P.M. curfew and found himself grounded for six months – from hanging out with his friends, from the Speech & Debate Team, from Drama, from anything, basically, that didn’t fall between the hours of 8 A.M. and 3 P.M.  And there were always horror stories of what other kids had to suffer.  They were whispered like urban legends and always dealt with kids a few years older, who had conveniently graduated and were no longer around to confirm or deny the rumors.  But they persisted, these extreme stories of beatings and starvation and confinement, unverified but convincing.  Garrett suspected many of these tales were started by parents themselves, the stories designed to make the punished teenager think, “Well, I guess things could always be worse.”

Garrett knew he had it comparatively easy, but even so, guilt didn’t come without its price.  The most egregious example of this had happened two years earlier.  After much tortured deliberation, he had asked Rachel Arnett to go with him to the big year-end 8th grade dance at the YMCA.  For the hormonally frenzied attendees, Y dances were Christmas, Halloween, New Year’s Eve and six home football games rolled into one.  If there were chaperones in attendance, they didn’t make their presence felt in the poorly lighted room where the near-freshmen alternately swayed like stiff-legged, kneeless zombies, or furiously felt each other up in the darkened corners, their hands desperately seeking purchase on one another like mountain climbers about to slide off the face of Everest.  It was into this morality-free zone that Garrett led Rachel, and he knew, as tradition dictated it must, that he would finally experience a girl’s lips that evening.  All his past rejections would be avenged in one glorious moment – which he secretly imagined happening to the accompaniment of L.L. Cool J’s anthem of male sensitivity, “I Need Love” – and he would be, at long last, a man.  Or at least less of a boy than he had been mere hours earlier.

By the time the final song of the evening rolled around, the kiss still hadn’t happened.  Garrett and Rachel had slow-danced several times in the last three hours, and even though a kiss was practically written in the contract, Garrett was having trouble screwing up enough courage to take the plunge.  For one thing, timing was an issue.  More than once, he had found himself prepared, mentally and physically, for the kiss: his neck was a coiled spring, ready to strike, but equally ready to retract if she seemed at all resisting or reluctant (his other mental version of the kiss, this one without LL Cool J, involved her accusing him of rape).  But just as he was leaning in, “Nobody’s Fool” by Cinderella faded out and Bon Jovi’s “You Give Love a Bad Name” came storming on, and another moment was lost.

By the time the DJ called last song – Chris De Burgh’s “Lady in Red” – Garrett was beginning to despair.  But knowing this was the last song meant he could take his time.  He wouldn’t be interrupted at the end by Poison or AC/DC.  He was mildly disappointed that the kiss would happen to Chris de Burgh instead of LL Cool J, but he had taped “Lady in Red” off the radio a couple weeks ago and knew he had approximately four minutes and fifteen seconds to lean in and let the magic happen.

His hands were on her hips, her hands were around his neck, and they waddled in their tight circle, careful not to bump any of the other couples circumscribing their own awkward spheres on the tiled floor that alternated rhythmically between red, then yellow, then green, then blue, then back to red again.  The rate at which they danced bore no relation to the tempo of the music; from song to song, their turning was metronomic.  They shuffled slightly from foot to foot as they went through the motions of their clumsy pivot, and Garrett might have been embarrassed at his lack of grace, but it only took attendance at one dance to realize that no one was judging anyone else’s finesse.  At that age, especially among the boys, dancing was the great equalizer.  If you were there, and lucky enough to share four minutes on the floor with a girl’s arms around your neck, that was all that mattered.  So Garrett shuffled his way through half the song, and at what he guessed was roughly the two-minute mark, he ducked his head to the right to catch Rachel’s eye.  He wasn’t sure how this kissing business worked.  In the movies, you made eye contact, and the rest took care of itself, but Garrett was acutely aware that if he didn’t blink soon, it would look like he was crying.  He leaned in minutely, hoping it would get the ball rolling.  And it did.  Garrett watched Rachel’s eyes close, watched her lean in at a corresponding angle, and as the distance between them slowly contracted to an ever-diminishing point, he felt the gates of his future, in counterpoint, opening wide.

But then the strangest thing happened.  As the pursed lips and closed, blue-eyeshadowed lids of Rachel Arnett’s eyes drifted inexorably toward him, he heard a voice in his head, as unwelcoming as the whine of a mosquito or the mushy chomping of Dylan Funderburg eating a peanut butter sandwich with his mouth open.  It was the reproving voice of his father: “Make good choices, Garrett.”  While it didn’t possess quite the sepulchral gravitas of Darth Vader’s commands in the Star Wars movies, it still rumbled in the way only Garrett’s father’s voice could rumble, and it was rumbling the sentence he used as a sort of multi-purpose incantation any time Garrett left the house: don’t cheat on that test, don’t drink beer with your friends, don’t speed, don’t buy tapes you don’t need, and on this evening, don’t, whatever you do, kiss that girl to the strains of “The Lady in Red” in the darkened YMCA multi-purpose room surrounded by dozens of other rutting teenagers whose parents don’t know well enough to warn them of the dangers of precocious canoodling.  And so, as the distance between their lips shrank to a speck no larger than the tip of a pencil, Garrett’s face abruptly detoured, and he planted a clumsy peck on Rachel’s cheek.  The song ended, he shook her hand like they had just brokered an important business deal, and he walked outside to wait for his parents to pick him up.  Even though he guessed another date with Rachel would more than likely end with the kiss he had been waiting for, he knew deep down that, in much the same way a particularly unpleasant song on the soundtrack can ruin an otherwise good movie, every time he met Rachel’s lips with his own, the moment would be accompanied by his father’s voice.  Even in junior high, Garrett knew continuing on that path would surely lead him to serious psychological trauma.

He went his way, Rachel went hers, and the first kiss would actually come a year later, with Melanie Light, after Garrett had managed to convince himself that “Make good choices” was just another parental variation on “wash behind your ears” – well-meaning and generally sound advice, but not something to be followed with slavish rigor.  What he eventually realized is that most of the choices he found himself presented with were ambiguous in nature, and it wasn’t always easy to brand them as definitively good or bad.  Garrett’s parents subscribed to the idea that each individual decision was a rock tossed into a pond, and Garrett would eventually feel the ripples from where he stood on the shore.  But Garrett found he couldn’t buy into that.  His choices were small-scale, low-key, commonplace.  He wasn’t deciding, for instance, whether to rob a bank or mug a homeless guy.  Sneaking a peek at the Algebra test of the kid sitting next to him might not be the most honorable action in the world, but it wasn’t going to bring his world screeching to a halt, even if caught.  And, truth to tell, that was the riskiest behavior Garrett engaged in.

Until Steph, that is, and the tape.  He knew his parents would look at is a bad choice, a deception, a lie, and it was, but Garrett chose instead to look at the big picture embodied in that decision: If Steph liked the tape enough to go out with him, and they really hit it off, and she fell in love with him – not the tape, and not the persona thrust upon him by the voice on the tape, but Garrett – then that seemed like a pretty good choice as far as bad choices go.  Both their lives would be enriched, and it seemed like splitting hairs to point out that the enrichment was enabled by deceit.  (If, on the other hand, Steph fell for him only for the tape, if she allowed herself to become involved with him based solely on the pretense that Garrett was a musician, if she didn’t actually like him at all, well, Garrett figured she had bigger issues to deal with than the fact that he had lied to her.)  By the time Steph said she could go out with him (on Saturday, and not Friday like Garrett had proposed, which meant more waiting) and he had to ask for the car, he knew to expect the upcoming gauntlet of guilt, but in the last year or so had developed the psychic armor necessary to emerge on the other side relatively unscathed.

Now, Garrett’s parents, Kathy and Steve, sat side by side on the family room sofa, and every time this scene repeated itself Garrett was reminded of the courtroom scene in the production of The Crucible he’d seen last year.  He’d loved the play and been fascinated when his parents explained Arthur Miller and the idea that the plot was an allegory for McCarthyism, but Garrett found its relevance to be far more personal in nature.  In the play, John Proctor was told his life would be spared if he admitted to being a witch, even though it was a lie.  Using the same tortured logic, Garrett often wondered if he could skip the usual interrogation by lying to his parents – citing a desire to go out, get roaring drunk, smoke as many varieties of cigarettes as he could get his hands on, have sex with the first carbon-based life form to cross his path, shoplift pornography, and run at least two red lights.  He would briefly entertain this course of action, hoping against hope that his parents might look on him as a teenaged Proctor and, appreciating his supposed honesty, grant him immediate amnesty from frivolous questioning.  It wasn’t realistic, he always concluded, and knew it would only end up getting him burned at the stake.

“Borrow the car?” his father asked, as though this were a completely novel request, the car having magically appeared in the garage overnight, planted there by elves or fairies, and he wasn’t yet used to its reality, its solidity.

“Yeah,” Garrett said, resisting the urge to shift nervously from foot to foot.  Even though he expected to be given the go-ahead, what would happen if they actually chose this time to deny his request?  Did he honestly think he’d stand a chance with Steph if his parents – or worse, hers – had to drive them around?

“You mean our car?”

“Yes, Dad. The one with the engine and the four wheels and the steering wheel.”

“Hm.  The one with the steering wheel.  Interesting.”  Steve stared off into the middle distance, apparently expecting to find exegetic runes suddenly blazing from the wood paneling, explaining to him with mythic precision how best to handle this demand from his recalcitrant son. “And you want to borrow it when?”

“Tomorrow.  Saturday.  April 25.  The day before Sunday.”

“And what are we planning on doing with this car, son?” His mom was fond of the royal we, as though the three of them were holding court in a cavernous throne room lined with suits of armor and imposingly serious portraits of Walkers from generations past.

“I’m just, you know, going out.”

“Gee, that doesn’t sound suspicious at all,” his father said with exaggerated sarcasm.  He was big on exaggerated sarcasm, all but nudging his listener in the ribs with a conspiratorial elbow.  “He’s going out, Kathy.  With the car.  And the steering wheel.”

“Are you going out by yourself?” Kathy Walker was kind and matronly, an effusive Midwestern mother, always a big hit with Garrett’s friends, and now she leaned forward expectantly on the couch, smiling broadly.  She already knew the answer to her question.  Garrett’s vague response to what he was going to do with the car let her know that something new was afoot.  If he were just hanging out with his friends, he would have said so.  This ambiguity was female in nature, and Kathy was tickled by her son’s linguistic contortions.

“No.”

“With friends?”

“Kind of.”  Garrett knew hedging like this would be as successful as the time he scrawled a large G on his bedsheet in permanent marker, safety-pinned it around his neck, and attempted to fly from their roof, but he clung to a fading hope that today he would be granted some conversational leeway.

“A kind-of friend,” she said, bemused.  “The plot thickens.  Will there be more than one kind-of friend in attendance?”

“No.  Just one.”

With the rough details of the transaction sketched, the interrogational ball bounced back to Garrett’s father: “If you were to describe this kind-of friend’s appearance in one word, what would it be?”

“Dad …”

“Would it be … handsome?”

All Garrett could do was sigh.

“How about manly?”

Dad.

“Neither handsome nor manly, then.  What are we left with, Kathy?”

“Butch?”

This was the part of the whole ordeal that Garrett never fully understood.  He knew why they subjected him to this, but he remained fuzzy on the methodology.  Watching them at work was like watching a bad stand-up routine, as they bounced lines off one another, entertaining no one more than themselves.  And Garrett, by virtue of being the lone son, was relegated to the role of the poor sucker in the audience singled out for abuse.  It was time to bring this portion of the show to a close, fast-forward to the inevitable lesson, and get on with his life.

“Okay.  Fine.  It’s a girl.  Okay?  Can I borrow the car?”

“Not so fast,” his father said.  “More details, please.  Does this girl have a name?”

“Steph.”

“Steph.” As though he were trying it on for size, dragging the letters out in contemplation, like he could divine her character though the phonetics of her name.  “Short for, what?  Stephanie?”

“Oh, God,” Garrett muttered in exasperation.

“No, I don’t think that’s it.  That would be some unusual abbreviation, right?”

Back to his mom, to hash out the fine print.  “What are you planning on doing with Stephanie and the car?”

“We’re just going to a movie,” Garret said.  “That’s it.  I’m picking her up, we’re going to a movie and then I’m taking her home.  We’re not stopping for cigarettes or alcohol or cocaine.  I’ll leave at 6, I’ll be back by 11, and I promise you won’t see my picture on the evening news.”

“Garrett, we just want to make sure you’re not going to get in trouble.”

“I know, Mom.  I really know.  You have no idea how much I know.”

Steve again. “We just want you to make good choices, Garrett.  You’ll be out there, just you and Steph and the car, and it’s tempting to let certain things happen …”

Once upon a time, Garrett would have interrupted his dad to protest, to defend his honor, to make the case that he did have some semblance of control.  Experience had taught him, though, that it was better to just suffer in silence and plan on sending his father the therapy bills he was sure to incur later in life.

“… but you have to understand that you’ve got a bright future, and even though it might seem like it’s the present that matters, you can’t lose sight of the future.  Right?”  And here he turned to Garrett’s mom for the tag team.

“Your father’s absolutely right, Garrett.  It’s okay to want to have fun and let loose with your friends or your girlfriend – “

“She’s not my girlfriend, Mom.”

“That’s all the more reason to be careful, Garrett.  You don’t want to jeopardize all the fantastic things you could do with your life by getting in trouble with a passing fancy.”

“Okay, okay.”

“Are we being too hard on you?” Kathy asked.  This was another one of the stops on the usual itinerary, the rest area labeled Victimization, located directly between Shame and Permission. “We just want what’s best for you.”

“No, it’s fine.  I appreciate your concern.” He’d been reading from the same script for so long that he sold the line with Oscar-worthy aplomb.

“Okay.  But have a good time.  You and Steph.” And here his dad, amazingly, as though oblivious to the rest of the conversation, winked at him. “Don’t do anything I wouldn’t do.”

“You can take my car, Garrett.” She was referring to the burgundy Pontiac Bonneville, the one Garrett hated. “There’s plenty of gas in it.”

“Okay.  Thanks, guys.  I’ll be careful.”

As Garrett retreated to his room, he marveled again at the process.  He loved his parents, but they were unlike any other parents he knew.  He was past the point of wondering if he had been adopted; now he was willing to accept a full-blown alien abduction.

*****

Current listening:

Aztec dreamland

Aztec Camera – Dreamland

Song of the Day (11/4/09) November 4, 2009

Posted by monty in music.
Tags: , ,
2 comments

Richard Hawley is the bee’s knees.   After doing session work for people like Beth Orton and Robbie Williams, and later serving as Pulp’s touring guitarist, Hawley eventually decided to turn his band to his own material.  The result is music that recalls, at various times, Scott Walker, Johnny Cash, Roy Orbison, and Elvis Presley, but is still distinctively Hawley’s.  Characterized by his distinctively melancholy baritone, Hawley makes music that’s the perfect accompaniment for cloudy days and rainy nights.  This is “Just Like the Rain,” from his 2005 album, Coles Corner.

Wounded World November 4, 2009

Posted by monty in news, politics, TV.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
2 comments

ParisHilton_Caulfield_8572072Part of me was ashamed to write about Jon Gosselin and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach the other day.  After all, a huge part of the problem with our celebutard-obsessed culture is that the media keeps giving them attention they don’t deserve.  Jon and Kate, Lindsay and Paris, the whack-job Mormon family who’ve mistaken Mom’s uterus for a broken gumball machine, the dimbulbs from The Hills, and the entire cast of the Twilight movies – they’d all be so much more bearable if their fame was proportional to their actual level of accomplishment.  That means I’d never know who Jon, Kate, Paris, or the Duggard family is, I’d know Lindsay only as the star of the Tina Fey-scripted Mean Girls, the Twilight cast would only appear in Entertainment Weekly articles I skip, and Heidi and Spencer and the rest of The Hills’ demon-spawn wouldn’t register on my radar until Joel McHale ridicules them on The Soup. There’s no earthly reason why any of these people show up on the news.  In a fair and just world, they’d be relegated to media oblivion.

sarah-palinThe same goes for Sarah Palin.  A full year after getting her ass handed to her by voters, she’s still hanging around, like the drunk who doesn’t realize the party’s over.  Her memoir, which we’re supposed to believe she wrote all by her widdle self in the space of a few months – despite the fact that she has yet to string more than three words together intelligibly in public – is currently ranked #3 on Amazon, which means that an unfortunate number of people actually believe she has something important to say about anything.  My guess is that the book will be good for either A) comic relief, or B) a literary drinking game, wherein the reader does a shot every time she uses the word maverick. Like all the names in the first paragraph, there is no reason, none whatsoever – and I’m quite serious about this – that she gets any media attention at all.  I don’t care if McCain chose her as his running mate in a cynical ploy to snatch vaginaed voters away from Obama.  She has yet to say anything of consequence about anything, and the fact that anyone is considering her a serious contender for the 2012 presidential election is testament only to how delusional a segment of this country remains.

There are exactly two choices for how the media should handle these people.  The first is to stop covering them.  It’s a simple solution, elegant and precise.  Don’t report on them, don’t show any photos or film, don’t tell us what they said.  They’re inconsequential, and every second you devote to them takes away a second you could be using to cover something that actually matters.

The other option – and I could conceivably throw the whole weight of my support behind this – is to reveal them as the buffoons they are.  If the NBC Nightly News were to include a 5-minute-long segment called “Daily Dickhead” where the likes of Spencer Pratt or Kim Kardashian were eviscerated through a montage of clips demonstrating their vacuous, selfish ways, I would tune in every night.  Seriously.  Any venture that encourages the American public to ridicule these self-involved twats is a worthwhile one, in my book.

And, incidentally, I would endorse this exact same handling of Sarah Palin.  Somehow we’ve arrived at the notion that being “fair” or being “objective” means treating both sides of an argument as equally valid.  As a result, we get serious news reporting of death panels and teabaggings and town hall meetings filled with angry white people who look like torch-wielding extras from Frankenstein. If the big news outlets were really worth their salt anymore, rather than report on these things as though they were legitimate news, they’d call bullshit on the whole enterprise.  The right-wing is going to paint the mainstream news media as a bunch of far-left pinko commie faggots anyway, so what would they have to lose if Brian Williams came to us on-air one night and said, “Sarah Palin said today in a town hall meeting that Barack Obama wants to kill your grandparents.  What a crazy bitch!”

I think it’s entirely fair to report on death panels and these teabag demonstrations or whatever else the right-wing concocts, but the Big 3 needs to have the smarts and the gumption to really report on them.  They need to show, for instance, how the right-wing is using lies and distortion and charged language to derail health care reform, as well as how Fox News and other Republican groups are organizing these supposedly “spontaneous” demonstrations.  The news bureaus feel, I guess, like they have to report on these things as serious phenomena, when the truth of it is, if they were really reporting objectively, they’d reveal all of it as a serious fraud to prey on voters’ fears of the U.S. turning into a grandma-killing noueveau-Cuba.

What we really need are more Matt Taibbis, the journalist who wrote the fantastic Rolling Stone article about the right-wing’s campaign against health care reform that I posted a month ago.  Taibbi wrote a terrific piece shortly after Palin stepped down as governor of Alaska, but he declined to publish it until now.  Here’s an excerpt:

Palin’s paranoid ramblings and self-pitying tantrums on the way out of office not only didn’t injure her chances for national office, they actually appeared to help, as polls taken in the week after her resignation showed that 71% of Republicans were now prepared to vote for her for president in 2012. Just as she had during the campaign last fall, Palin defied rational analysis by making a primal connection with the subterranean resentments of white middle America, which is apparently so pissed off now at the rest of the planet for not coddling its hurt feelings in the multicultural age that it is willing to embrace any politician who validates its insane sense of fucked-overness.

Nobody understands this political reality quite like Palin, even if she doesn’t actually understand it in the sense of someone who thinks her way to a conclusion, but merely lives it, unconsciously, with the unerring instinct of a herd animal. Palin’s supporters don’t judge her according to her almost completely nonexistent qualifications for serious office, they perceive her as they would a character in a Biblical narrative, a Job in heels with cross-eyes and a mashed-potato-brained husband who happens to spend a lot of time getting shat upon by Letterman and Maureen Dowd and the other modern-day Enemies of Christ.

On some level Palin understands better than any of us that what’s important to her base isn’t how well she does her job or even what she does with her time before 2012, but who her enemies are and how loudly she beats the drum against them – and when the news comes out that these foes have recently driven her to such distraction that she even started losing her hair (reportedly necessitating a recent emergency trip to personal hairdresser Jessica Steele), it elevates her conservative martyr credentials to previously unimagined levels.

As a national candidate she seems to us normal/rational observers mortally wounded, but as a conduit for middle American resentment she may actually have gained in stature, and don’t be at all surprised if she doesn’t emerge with the status of something like a religious figure when they roll the rock back for her inevitable candidacy three years from now.

This is exactly the kind of reporting we need now.  We need the news media to stop acting like every argument is pitched on a level playing field, and that every media personality needs to be treated with the same deference.  We need the media to do the heavy lifting and the critical thinking much of this country is unwilling to do itself.  And that means they need to be ready to point out the people, on both sides of the political fence and in all aspects of the media, that seek to do us harm.

True/Slant–Taibblog (11/02/09): Palinoia

*****

Current listening:

Talking heads true stories

Talking Heads – True Stories

Current reading:

BANR2005-full

Rattawut Lapcharoensap – “At the Café Lovely” (in The Best American Nonrequired Reading 2005, ed. by Dave Eggers)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.